Forest Society and Easton Officials Testify Against Northern Pass

Print More

Garry Rayno photo

Easton town officials, left to right, long-time planning board member,Jim Collier, conservation commission chair Kris Pastoriza, and selectman Robert Thibault testified Monday at the Site Evaluation Committee's adjudicative hearing on the Northern Pass transmission line project.


CONCORD — Northern Pass’s buried transmission line through Easton would more than double the town’s property value, but the town has continually voted to oppose the $1.6 billion project.

At Monday’s Site Evaluation Committee’s adjudicative hearing on the 192-mile, high-voltage transmission line, attorney Barry Needleman, representing Northern Pass, said the projected assessment would be $87 million, which would be 56 percent of the town’s property value making the community the largest recipient of any town the project passes through.

But selectman Robert Thibault said the figure is misleading because at the end of the 40-year depreciation period the assessment would be zero.

“It has come up for years and the town has repeatedly voted to put $50,000 in and pay lawyers to fight this,” Thibault said. “We will not be sacrificed at any price, especially with a company that will do everything (it) can to reduce their tax payments.”

Town officials detailed their meetings with Northern Pass and state officials since the project was first proposed in 2010, the first year the town approved a warrant article opposing the project to bring Hydro-Quebec electricity to the New England grid. The town has approved a similar article every year since.

After seven years, town officials said they still do not know where the buried line will go along the town’s artery, Route 116.

The town continues to wait for official surveys the Department of Transportation told Northern Pass it needs before acting on requests to bury the transmission line under state roadways, Thibault said.

He said the right-of-way in sections along Route 116 is three-rod wide which makes a very tight fit for underground drilling and splice vaults.

“We do not want the town and property owner involved in lawsuits over this,” Thibault said. That is why the selectmen wrote the Department of Transportation in October asking the agency to set the right-of-ways along Route 116, he said, noting they have yet to receive a reply.

The narrow road and state right-of-way would mean the road would have to be closed during some construction periods, Thibault said, and that would impact emergency services because there are no easy detours for much of the town.

He noted if some sections of Route 116 are closed, the detour could be more than 20 miles and the town depends on help from surrounding communities for police and fire fighters with only a volunteer fire department.

Longtime planning board member Jim Collier said Route 116 was originally a footpath from Haverhill to Franconia and then over time became a road for autos.

“We live in a town with a country road.  We’re not ashamed of it, we are proud of it,” Collier said. “It was not a road to move 14-wheel dump trucks over.”

Collier touted one of the finest “glacial drift aquifers” in the state the town protects through a zoning overlay district.

The transmission line would go through the aquifer and would not be allowed under town zoning, he noted. The Site Evaluation Committee decision and its conditions would preempts local zoning and land use ordinances.

Thibault also said the project would lower property values along the buried transmission line. The properties account for one-third of all properties in town, he noted.

Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests president Jane Difley, and vice president Will Abbott, testified against the Northern Pass transmission project Monday at the Site Evaluation Committee’s adjudicative hearing. Garry Rayno photo

Some of those property owners have told him they would seek tax abatements, he said, and that will increase taxes for the non-abutting property owners.

Needleman questioned if the town had done any analysis or research of other places with transmission lines to judge whether  property values would be diminished because the company’s expert believes property values along the buried sections will not be impacted.

Thibault said it was common sense the property value would diminish with a high-voltage transmission line buried in the front yards.

Needleman questioned Conservation Commission chair Kris Pastoriza about earlier statements she made that the line should be buried when an overhead the line was proposed.

But Pastoriza said that was when she and others believed burying the line would entail a four-inch conduit and not what is bring proposed with two encased lines and splice vaults.

Forest Society

Two representatives of the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests testified that the easements it holds or owns outright that would be impacted by the transmission project are “priceless.”

Society vice president Will Abbott said the project’s most damaging impact would be on The Rocks Estate the society owns in Bethlehem.

The estate is used to raise Christmas trees — the society sells about 50,000 a year — and is the society’s northern visitation and education center.

“The most significant impact is not to the Rocks property itself but to the views of the Presidential Mountain range,” Abbott said. “It is one of most spectacular views of the Presidentials in New Hampshire that will have 85-foot to 105-foot towers that don’t exist today.”

The society’s president Jane Difley said between 12,000 and 14,000 people a year visit the Rocks.  “Visitors come for the experience to wander through fields, cut down a Christmas tree,” she said, “and wander around in the snow in Bethlehem with incredible views.”

Visitors come from all over the world and the United States, Difley said, and local bed and breakfasts promote the experience. “This is not grabbing a tree off a rack,” she said.

Abbott said the transmission line would impact 13 conservation easements the society holds and said several prohibit commercial use, which is what Northern Pass would be.

He said the society expects to legally challenge the project’s use of the sites.

Abbott said there are different requirements in other easements that also would not allow their use for a transmission line.

But Needleman noted one of the society’s land acquisitions intended to block the project near the Balsams resort, meant the transmission line had to be moved and that makes it more visible from Little Diamond Pond and Coleman State Park.

“The (transmission line) could have been located further away, not on the ridge, but behind the ridge,” Needleman said, “and the impact on Little Diamond Pond could have been avoided.”

But Abbott said all the impacts could be avoided if there were no overhead towers. The society wants the transmission lines buried in the new 30-mile section from the Canadian border to Dummer and along I-93.

“The issue is not one location,” Abbott said. “Wherever you put the towers are unreasonable impacts.”

The final adjudicative hearings on Northern Pass are scheduled to end before Christmas. Deliberative sessions are scheduled for January and February.

The committee has until the end of February to make a decision on the project first proposed in 2010.

Eversource had hoped to have all federal and state permits by the end of this year with construction beginning next year and the transmission line finished by the end of 2020.

The next hearing will be Tuesday with Deefield abutters to the project.

Garry Rayno can be reached at

Comments are closed.