Pandemic Is As Bad As It Has Ever Been

Print More

Nancy West photo

Garry Rayno is's State House Bureau Chief. He is pictured in the press room at the State House in Concord.


The numbers are shocking.

One day last week, the state announced 3,149 new COVID-19 infections, and another 2,633 another day.

Deaths were in the double digits most days, not single numbers, and almost 30 one day.

The state figures for COVID-19 sufferers in the states’s hospitals were below 400 for most of the week.

But those statistics are misleading because they only count patients with active COVID-19 infections and not those who are no longer infectious but still too ill to go home.

With the two combined, the number of people hospitalized because of COVID-19 was consistently more than 500 last week. 

And the positivity rate of people tested for the virus was a staggering 21 percent last week. That means one of every five people tested has COVID. For much of last summer and into the beginning of fall the positivity rate was below 5 percent or one in 20 tests.

The situation in New Hampshire is the worst it has ever been during the pandemic with few if any mitigation measures in place at the state level unlike last winter.

But New Hampshire is not alone.

In Vermont the daily infections are record setting as well with several days over 2,000 cases and record numbers of hospitalized COVID-19 sufferers.

Not long ago, Vermont had very few new cases and nearly no one in a hospital with the deadly disease.

Vermont has often been touted as a state that handled the pandemic in a very effective manner, holding on to restrictions until vaccination levels reached 70 percent or more, when that figure was thought to be the threshold of control.

But like many other states, the Delta and Omicron variants have overrun the mitigation efforts.

New Hampshire’s other two neighbors, Maine and Massachusetts, are both experiencing record levels of new cases with 30,000 announced one day last week in the Bay State and a seven-day average of 20,000 new infections.

That state’s hospitals are overflowing like New Hampshire’s and Vermont’s and elective and non-emergency surgery is curtailed.

In Massachusetts, the highly contagious Omicron variant is dominant and is spreading rapidly and coming to a theater near you soon.

Looking at the current data, you would not know New England is the most vaccinated region in the country. However, there is one state significantly lower than the others, New Hampshire.

According to vaccination tracking by the New York Times, New Hampshire’s overall full vaccination rate is 67 percent, the same as Texas’s, below Florida’s 75 percent rate and South Dakota’s 72 percent, but above North Dakota’s 63 percent and most southern states.

In Vermont, Connecticut and Rhode Island the vaccination rate is 90 percent, while it is 92 percent in Massachusetts and 87 percent in Maine.

But the vaccination rate seems to have little to do with the infection rate due to the highly infectious Omicron, but does have a great deal to do with the death and hospitalization rates.

The new medicine approved to treat COVID-19 cannot get to New England fast enough.

And there is help on the way, dealing with the back end of the illness, freeing up more hospital beds, not the front end, which would work to slow the rate of infections.

Last week Gov. Chris Sununu activated more National Guard troops to help overflowing hospitals and nursing homes, both bending under the weight of staff shortages and fatigue.

Federal strike teams are here to help and more are on the way. Teams to administer monoclonal antibodies will be here eventually, something Sununu asked the federal government to do, which it agreed to do.

New Hampshire can certainly use the federal help

The first of December, New Hampshire had the highest infection rate per 100,000 residents in the country and the contagious Omicron variant was responsible for only a small percentage of the infections, but that is changing.

New Hampshire is not in a good position going into the heart of winter.

As one Dartmouth-Hitchcock physician said last week, the current spike in cases is driven by family get-togethers and increased socializing over the holidays.

The health-care system is already stressed to its limit and Omicron is lurking in the alleyway waiting to inflict its damage.

In other words, the worst is yet to come, with only the when and how debilitating the unknowns.

Politics has to bear a good part of the blame for what awaits the state.

There is no statewide mask mandate, schools and businesses are on their own if they decide to impose one.

And those school boards and selectmen or city councils or business owners who do impose them are subject to organized bullying and social media trolling.

And the state’s political climate has created some real health-care issues. 

An unruly mob shut down one Executive Council meeting when more than $20 million in federal money was on the council’s agenda to boost the state’s lagging vaccination programs.

The mob was eventually successful as the four Republicans on the Executive Council later voted to block accepting federal money as did the Republican members of the Joint Legislative Fiscal Committee,

Several claimed the state would have to enforce federal vaccine mandates if it expected the money, although the governor and attorney general argued that is not true.

The money was to be used to roll out vaccinations for children and booster shots for the elderly, but those efforts were delayed for several months.

The council and fiscal committee eventually agreed, but by then the surge was well established and growing.

Numerous bills before the Legislature this year would ban mask or vaccine mandates for just about everyone from private businesses to health care organizations and private educational institutions.

If some of these bills are passed, the problems will not go away, they will only grow.

Some lawmakers do not take the pandemic seriously, or they want to believe it is over.

Last week the House debated a bill to allow representatives to be paid milage for their trips to facilities outside Concord to hold sessions in larger safer environments than Representatives Hall provides.

During that debate, Rep. Michael Sylvia, R-Belmont, opposed the bill saying it would continue efforts to address “a pandemic that has come to an end.”

That caused a stir and some vocal objections.

House Speaker Sherman Packard had at home COVID-19 tests distributed to representatives to test themselves before returning the next day.

During the next day’s session, it was revealed one Republican lawmaker tested positive, but came to the session anyway.

A visibly upset Packard told the House if it were true, the person should leave immediately.

Earlier this year, several medical professionals who are representatives expressed concern the state’s high infection rate, coupled with the contagious Omicron variant, could lead to a super spreader event.

Republicans had earlier in the week voted down the latest attempt to allow at-risk members to participate remotely.

If the COVID-19 surge is as bad as it appears it will be, lawmakers may want to revisit remote participation as the Vermont legislature is doing for the first two weeks of its session.

But then again, they will probably vote it down as they have done four times before.

Garry Rayno may be reached at

Distant Dome by veteran journalist Garry Rayno explores a broader perspective on the State House and state happenings for Over his three-decade career, Rayno covered the NH State House for the New Hampshire Union Leader and Foster’s Daily Democrat. During his career, his coverage spanned the news spectrum, from local planning, school and select boards, to national issues such as electric industry deregulation and Presidential primaries. Rayno lives with his wife Carolyn in New London.

Comments are closed.