Serious Medical Errors Plague Hospitals in NH

Print More

Over the next two weeks, InDepthNH.org will report on ‘adverse events’ and patient safety in New Hampshire’s hospitals. Nationwide, an estimated 440,000 people die prematurely every year as a result of preventable medical errors. If you or a loved one has experienced a hospital adverse event or other medical injury, please email nancywestnews@gmail.com 

InDepthNH.org Series on Medical Errors in NH Hospitals
Part 2: Disagreement On How To Stop Serious, Preventable Medical Errors in NH Hospitals
Part 3a: Doctor’s in the House: Tips on Staying Safe in the Hospital
Part 3b: How To Become Your Own Patient Safety Advocate in NH
Part 3c:
Telling Noah’s Story to Stop Medical Errors in NH Hospitals

eventsperyear

Source: Department of Health and Human Services

eventspercentage

Source: Department of Health and Human Services

By Nancy West

Adverse events are commonly called “never events” because they are never supposed to happen to patients in hospitals.

In New Hampshire, they include 29 serious, avoidable incidents in hospitals such as surgery on the wrong patient or body part, items left inside a patient, burns, falls, medication errors, assaults, sexual assaults and suicide. (see complete list below by hospital)

They must cause serious harm or death to qualify as reportable adverse events.

The number appears to be climbing over the first five years that state law has mandated public reporting, but experts say the increase could be attributed to changes in the definition of pressure sores and increased reporting.

A total of 42 such events were reported in the state’s 26 hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in 2010, and 73 in 2014, according to the 2014 Adverse Event Report compiled by the state Bureau of Licensing and Certification, the most recent year available.

Michael Fleming, director of the Bureau of Licensing and Certification, said the most important part of the reporting program is the opportunity for different hospitals to learn from each other’s mistakes.

“I believe everybody is engaged to pull these numbers down to as low as possible, but in order to do that you want to encourage full transparency so that people can figure out why these things are happening,” Fleming said.

To that end, this year hospital officials had input into the final adverse event report.

Hospital participation made for a more well-rounded explanation of events, Fleming said. For instance, hospitals included the number of beds and surgeries performed to give context to the numbers.

It will take another year of reporting to see if the increase in numbers requires further investigation, Fleming said. Some of the increase could be the result of a better understanding on the part of hospitals about what to report, he said.

Knowing how many beds in a hospital and the number of surgeries performed is helpful to show why one hospital may report more adverse events than others.

He pointed to Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, the hospital with the most beds and surgeries, which also had the most surgical errors – 11 of them – in the last three years of the report.

“A hospital like Dartmouth-Hitchcock takes the worst of the worst cases, the ones that no one else can handle,” Fleming said. “You would expect their outcomes would be different from a hospital that takes only the best of the best.”

According to the 2014 report, there were three major areas responsible for 83 percent of the events reported.  Falls accounted for 34 percent, pressure ulcers 30 percent and surgical events for 19 percent. Elliot Hospital in Manchester had the most falls in 2013 and 2014 with a total of nine, the report said.

“(I)t is important that we focus on these and address what the NH hospitals are doing to prevent them from occurring,” the report noted.

The report said surgical errors can be reduced or eliminated with “stronger leadership by surgeons in the final team time out process which occurs just prior to incision, by having the surgeon ask each team member to introduce themselves and their role, review unique patient concerns, and end with a request to everyone involved to speak up if they have any concerns at any point during the procedure.

“Introduction of the patient to the team serves to enhance greater personal engagement and investment in good outcomes by each team member.”

Hospital compliance

Fleming believes the state’s hospital and acute care facilities are reporting as they should, although he is in the process of investigating a complaint against a hospital that may not have been in compliance. The ambulatory surgery centers reported no adverse events for 2014.

He wouldn’t identify the hospital because of the investigation, but said hospitals face a $2,000 fine if they fail to report and his bureau audits 10 percent of complaints each year.

After reporting an incident, the hospital is required to perform a root cause analysis of and initiate a corrective plan.

National ‘epidemic’

A 2013 study by John T. James, Ph.D., in the Journal of Patient Safety estimated that 440,000 people die each year from adverse events in hospitals.

“The epidemic of patient harm in hospitals must be taken more seriously if it is to be curtailed,” James reported.

“Fully engaging patients and their advocates during hospital care, systematically seeking the patients’ voice in identifying harms, transparent accountability for harm, and intentional correction of root causes of harm will be necessary to accomplish this goal.”

Anne Diefendorf, vice president of patient safety and quality at the Foundation for Healthy Communities, a sister organization of the New Hampshire Hospital Association, spoke to InDepthNH.org on behalf of the state’s hospitals.

“In many ways, we’re pleased,” Diefendorf said about the 2014 Adverse Event Report. “We feel the integrity of reporting has continued to be a strong focus of the hospitals.”

Progress is being made as hospitals share information with each other and more events might be picked up as a result, she said.

“In terms of falls and pressure ulcers across the board, people are trying to be more robust in terms of their surveillance …,” Diefendorf said.

Overall, the major focus of the hospitals right now is to find ways to engage more with patients and their families, Diefendorf said.

Consumer knowledge

Lisa McGiffert, director of the Safe Patient Project for Consumer Reports, said it is important for people to understand that reportable adverse events make up only a portion of hospital errors. They don’t include, for instance, people harmed by hospital acquired infections.

“These errors are narrowly defined,” McGiffert said. “People should recognize these are not all errors that happen in hospitals.”

And they do not include the many falls or other events that do not result in death or serious injury. McGiffert is skeptical that all hospitals report as required.
The adverse events just shouldn’t happen at all, she said. “They are all preventable,” McGiffert said.

Even with the limitations of the systems in 28 states that report, McGiffert said: “I think it’s important for this information to be tracked.”

The states that track adverse events have a host of different systems, events and protocols. Some report publicly by hospital such as New Hampshire. Others provide only aggregate information.

Legislative input

State Rep. Cindy Rosenwald, D-Nashua, co-sponsored the original legislation that mandates hospitals report adverse events. She noted some of the areas of increase, especially in the fall and pressure sore categories.

“They have made a few changes to adverse events reporting and that has driven up some of the numbers,” said Rosenwald, who is the House deputy democratic leader. Still, she would like to see them lower, but believes overall New Hampshire hospitals provide excellent care.

“These are events that should never happen,” Rosenwald said. “Even one is too many.”

Rosenwald believes the mandating law is working well and helping hospitals to focus on making needed improvements to eliminate them. She submitted legislation this session to extend the New Hampshire Health Care Quality Assurance Commission for five more years.

The commission is charged with reviewing and analyzing quality of care and patient safety issues in hospitals such as the adverse events at hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers.

The commission allows hospital officials to meet and share confidential information about never events and near misses to seek out and share solutions, she said.

“Providers can get together in confidence to discuss things that almost happened and how they discovered how to avoid them,” Rosenwald said, adding there is a public member on the commission as well.

“I think hospitals take these very seriously,” Rosenwald said. “We’re so proud of the quality of New Hampshire’s healthcare system.”

Fleming said he doesn’t believe any of the 2014 adverse event errors in New Hampshire resulted in death, but the detailed investigations and remedial plans are not made public.

“Most are not fatal, but they are all serious,” Fleming said.

“Again the whole idea is to get the number down really, really low and have everybody looking at their systems to learn from other people’s mistakes,” Fleming said.

Coming up with an easy to understand definition of “serious” event proved challenging at first, he said. “We talked with people at the hospitals and said, ‘If it was your mom that this happened to, would you consider it to be serious?’ That actually provided clarity,” Fleming said.

The law has been worth the work to enforce and document even if the number of events isn’t going down, he said. “If nothing else, it holds the hospitals accountable to report.”

Fleming said patients are always told if they are the victim of any error in the hospital, not just serious ones. Family members must be told if the patient dies as a result, he said.

The state has created a separate database of events that hospitals report out of an abundance of caution that don’t meet the criteria of an adverse event, Fleming said.

“At least we know the hospital was being transparent,” he said.

As to the prospect of reducing the numbers further, Fleming said: “My opinion is zero is impossible. However, it is a good goal that everybody strives for.”

“I personally think the care in New Hampshire hospitals is very strong. Are there improvements that every hospital can make every day? Absolutely,” Fleming said.

“But every hospital in the state is striving to be as good as it can be and make the numbers as low as possible.”

Here is link to full 2014 Adverse Event Report The following chart is on Page 5

2014 adverse events by hospital

combined

The serious events that hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers are required to report are listed in the report. There were no adverse events reported in 2014 in ambulatory surgery centers.
The following is the state’s list of the events from the 2014 Adverse Event Report:

 Surgical or invasive procedure events

  • Surgery or other invasive procedure performed on the wrong site
  • Surgery or other invasive procedure performed on the wrong patient
  • Wrong surgical or other invasive procedure performed on a patient
  • Unintended retention of a foreign object in a patient after surgery or other invasive procedure
  • Intraoperative or immediately postoperative/post procedure death in an ASA Class 1 patient

Product or device events

  • Patient death or serious injury associated with the use of contaminated drugs, devices, or biologics provided by the healthcare setting
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with the use or function of a device in patient care, in which the device is used or functions other than as intended
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with intravascular air embolism that occurs while being cared for in a healthcare setting

 Patient protection events

  • Discharge or release of a patient/resident of any age, who is unable to make decisions, to other than an authorized person
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with patient elopement (disappearance)
  • Patient suicide, attempted suicide, or self-harm that results in serious injury, while being cared for in a healthcare setting

Care management events

  • Patient death or serious injury associated with a medication error (e.g., errors involving the wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong patient, wrong time, wrong rate, wrong preparation, or wrong route of administration)
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with unsafe administration of blood products
  • Maternal death or serious injury associated with labor or delivery in a low-risk pregnancy while being cared for in a healthcare setting
  • Death or serious injury of a neonate associated with labor or delivery in a low-risk pregnancy
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with a fall while being cared for in a healthcare setting
  • Any Stage 3, Stage 4, and unstageable pressure ulcers acquired after admission/presentation to a healthcare setting
  • Artificial insemination with the wrong donor sperm or wrong egg (updated)
  • Patient death or serious injury resulting from the irretrievable loss of an irreplaceable biological specimen
  • Patient death or serious injury resulting from failure to follow up or communicate laboratory, pathology, or radiology test results

Environmental events

  • Patient or staff death or serious injury associated with an electric shock in the course of a patient care process in a healthcare setting
  • Any incident in which systems designated for oxygen or other gas to be delivered to a patient contain no gas, the wrong gas, or are contaminated by toxic substances
  • Patient or staff death or serious injury associated with a burn incurred from any source in the course of a patient care process in a healthcare setting
  • Patient death or serious injury associated with the use of physical restraints or bedrails while being cared for in a healthcare setting

Radiologic events

  • Death or serious injury of a patient or staff associated with the introduction of a metallic object into the M RI area

Potential criminal events

  • Any instance of care ordered by or provided by someone impersonating a physician, nurse, pharmacist, or other licensed healthcare provider
  • Abduction of a patient/resident of any age
  • Sexual abuse/assault on a patient or staff member within or on the grounds of a healthcare setting
  • Death or serious injury of a patient or staff member resulting from a physical assault (i.e., battery) that occurs within or on the grounds of a healthcare setting

In addition to the NQF list of SREs, NH law also requires the following event to be reported:

The exposure of a patient to a non-aerosolized bloodborne pathogen by a health care worker’s intentional, unsafe act. An act by hospital or ambulatory surgery center staff resulting in an infection or disease shall be considered to be purposefully unsafe if it meets all of the following criteria:
(1) There was an intentional act or reckless behavior;
(2) No reasonable person with similar qualifications, training, and experience would have acted the same way under similar circumstances; and
(3) There were no extenuating circumstances that could justify the act

Leave a Reply